Everyone knows that losses in silage quality have negative consequences for feed costs and animal health. However, it is not easy to see at first glance how this is expressed in concrete figures. This article will take position into this aspect. Of course, the prices are not the same for all regions, so this results in differences that everyone can calculate for his own farm.
Rations with different silage quality
| Figure 1: Consequences of silage quality for ration design | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Feed (kg) | Euro / DT | Silage A | Silage B |
| Grass silage 1 | 5 | 18 | |
| Grass silage 2 | 5 | 15 | |
| Maize silage 1 | 4 | 18 | |
| Maize silage 2 | 4 | 15 | |
| Straw | 12 | 0,7 | 0,6 |
| Wheat/barly | 15 | 5 | 6 |
| Grain maize | 19 | 2,0 | 3,0 |
| Soy meal | 38 | 1,3 | 1,75 |
| Rapeseed meal | 22 | 1,3 | 1,75 |
| Mineral feed | 62 | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| DM-intake (kg) | 22,1 | 22,0 | |
| Milk yield (kg) | 36,4 | 36,0* | |
| DM from forage (kg) | 13,2 | 10,6** | |
| Concentrated feed (kg) | 9,6 | 12,5** | |
| Starch/ sugar (%) | 30,5 | 33,8** | |
| Cost in euro/ animal | 3,79 | 4,17*** | |
* 36 kg are not realistically possible with ration B
** high health risk
*** Additional cost of ration B = 0.38 euro/animal and day = 138 euro/year!
| Table 1: Silage quality | DM | CP | CF | NEL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass: very well | 350 | 184 | 214 | 6,6 |
| Gras: well | 350 | 155 | 276 | 6,0 |
| Maize: very well | 350 | 81 | 6,9 | |
| Maize: well | 350 | 82 | 6,9 |
In this case, a balanced ration of grass and maize silage in the feeding conditions serves as an example. The ration is designed for the high-performance group at 36 kg milk production value with a dry matter intake of approx. 22 kg.
Ration A – silages with very good quality
In Ration A, the silages have excellent ingredients. The two feed components were calculated using the contents highlighted in dark green in table 1. The upper line refers to the values of the grass silage and the lower line the values of the maize silage. In order to achieve a milk yield of 36 kg, straw was added for the structure, cereals, maize, and protein feed. The mineral feed used here also includes salt and feed lime, which are contained in these 400 g.
The result of Ration A represents a basic feed to concentrated feed ratio of approx. 58:42%. Starch and sugar are already at the upper limit of the recommendations with 30.5%. The cost is €3.79 per animal and day.
Ration B – silages with good quality
Ration B shows the situation when feeding silages with good ingredients (values highlighted in light green). Because of the lower values, which are related to protein and energy content, these must be balanced by more energy and protein feeds. To make the situation comparable, the same requirement applies here as for Ration A (Milk yield 36 kg for DM intake 22 kg). The increased concentrated feed requirement thus displaces basic feed, whereby the contents must be reduced by 3 kg and the amount of concentrated feed increased by approx. 3 kg.
For ration B, this leads to the following result: the basic feed–concentrated feed ratio shifts to approx. 46:54%. The starch and sugar content is now 33.8%. This can have a significant negative effect on the health of the cow. Rumen acidosis, reduced digestive activity and claw diseases can be possible consequences here. The cost of the ration rises by 38 cents per animal and day. With a farm size of 100 animals, this corresponds to an additional expenditure of €13,800 per year. It is also aggravating that rising veterinary costs and increased replacement rates are not yet included here. Even the requirements with 36 kg Milk yield cannot realistically be achieved with this ration.
Possible cost savings
Figure 2: Possible cost savings in cents/kg ECM (source: Dr G. Dorfner, State Office for Agriculture, supplemented and modified)
In a study, the Bavarian State Office for Agriculture published the values shown in figure 2 for possible savings in terms of costs in cents per kilogram of energy-corrected milk. The biggest factors here are coarse feed losses and coarse feed production costs.
Just before the upcoming grass harvest, the possible variants for your own farm should be reviewed here again: In addition to the known grassland measures and processes in silage management, cutting time and the targeted use of silage inoculants play an important role. An early cut and the controlled fermentation process resulting from the silage additive effect produce high-quality and stable protein in the silages. This eliminates the need to purchase expensive protein feeds (note: GMO free milk). Your JOSERA consultant will be happy to assist you in this process – for example, by using a silage additive calculator to show you the costs and benefits for your farm’s own silages.
(No reviews available)
Loading...
You might be interested in the following contents:
NEW: Turbo, Safety and Symbiosis – Effect
Since the market launch and the now 20 year existence of the silage inoculant brand “Josilac”, there has been and is still a constant development and progression process.
Silage management- The path to optimal ensiling
The forage is the most important component in the feeding of dairy cattle. Feed costs account for the largest portion of milk production costs. Forage offers the highest potential for cost optimisation.